WEF’s Big Reset Program Continues To Be Heavily Rejected By Critics CryptoBlog


Amid the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, bureaucrats, financial institutions, multinational corporations and international organizations around the world have started promoting the concept of the Great Reset, an idea pioneered by the World Economic Forum (WEF) which claims support a greener and fairer world. Since the idea of ​​the Great Reset started to see a lot more promotion that year and well into 2020, a large number of citizens around the world have spoken out against the topic. The controversial topic has risen to such prominence that fact-checkers were deployed on social media platforms last year to tackle alleged misinformation on the subject of the Great Reset. Today, various people are still condemning Great Reset content on social media and chastising the establishment that carried the message.

WEF tweet “You will own nothing and you will be happy” now deleted from 2016

If you follow the news and pay attention to economics and politics, you’ve probably heard of the Great Reset and the phrase “You shall own nothing and be happy.” Many people associate the Great Reset and the phrase with the World Economic Forum (WEF), an independent international organization founded by Klaus Schwab. This is because the WEF tweeted about eight predictions for the year 2030 as of November 2016.

The tweet and quote “You will own nothing and you will be happy” comes from a editorial notice written by Danish MP Ida Auken. Then, years later, in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, there was a big Great Reset push from the WEF and Schwab published a book called: “Covid-19: The Great Reset”.

WEF's Grand Reset Program Continues To Be Rejected
This specific tweet about the eight predictions for the world in 2030 has been deleted.

The idea is about a stream of political change, a post-Covid 19 world, equality, climate change and the reinvention of capitalism. The WEF is not the only proponent of the Great Reset idea as Canada’s 23rd and current Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has backed the idea and US President Joe Biden has also been accused of endorsing the concepts. of the Great Reset via its “Build Back Better”. ” program.

WEF's Grand Reset Program Continues To Be Rejected
A tweet the WEF made in response to the now-deleted tweet from November 18, 2016, had this screenshot attached. “The blog series this video is based on is a thought experiment to spark questions about the future. More context in the author’s note at the end of this blog,” the WEF wrote years later. late, October 26, 2020.

A website called greatreset.com promoting the idea caught people’s attention, and TIME magazine published a collection of Great Reset editorials that endorse the theme. In an article published in June 2020, the founder of the WEF believes that the world must demand that the private sector join the movement.

“Clearly the will to build a better society exists,” Schwab wrote. “We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need. It will require stronger and more effective governments, although it will not imply an ideological push for the big ones. And it will require the commitment of the sector privacy every step of the way,” adds the WEF founder.

WEF's Grand Reset Program Continues To Be Rejected
TIME magazine’s collection of Great Reset editorials.

‘Foolish Great Reset’ decried by critics, new International Freedom Forum aims to push back the Great Reset

To date, a large number of people are very much against the WEF’s Great Reset idea, and the topic has been rife on social media since late 2020. Last year, fact checkers were deployed on social networking sites like Twitter, and a Reuters Fact Check report claimed: “The World Economic Forum does not have a stated goal of people owning nothing and being happy by 2030.” Despite statements like these and establishment fact-checkers, many observers believe the Great Reset is a collectivist agenda.

Actor and political activist Russell Brand discussed the Great Reset in April 2022. Brand’s Great Reset video has had 1.8 million views on Facebook and approximately 859,864 views on Youtube. The topic of the reboot agenda is still relevant to this day and on social media it is discussed on a daily basis. Matt Gubba, CEO of Bizbritain, a finance broker based in Marlow, England, talked on the creation of the International Liberty Forum in order to fight against the concepts of Great Reset.

“Our fight against the WEF is on,” Gubba told his 103,400 Twitter followers on Tuesday. “I would like to introduce the International Liberty Forum to you. Over the next few weeks, we’ll be working hard to build a platform to push back the Great Reset and send Klaus packing his bags. This battle CAN be won.

Canadian Conservative Paul Mitchell of the Wildrose Independence Party of Alberta, a provincial political party in Canada, says central bank digital currencies are part of the Great Reset plan. “The WEF is pushing to end cash and replace it with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as part of its senseless big reset,” Mitchell said. said, sharing a Zerohedge article on a cashless society. “People in the UK are apparently not cooperating and are increasingly using cash. Canadians should do the same,” Mitchell added.

Sikh futurist For Truth told his 54,300 Twitter followers that the Great Reset idea was about mass control. “The World Economic Forum and the goal of all globalist governments and organizations is to engineer a ‘great reset’ – the result will be a UN-based world government grounded in climate hysteria with mass social and digital control “, Sikh For Truth said Wednesday. While many people called the Great Reset a fascist plan to install a totalitarian world order of elitists, most of today’s media calls it a right-wing anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory.

Excellent reset metrics via Google Trends Get a significant amount of global interest compared to most of the topics polled

By simply searching with the terms “Great Resetand “WEF” on Twitter and other social media websites, search results will always lead to posts or threads disparaging big restart ideas such as climate change solutions, capitalism stakeholders and political globalism. Interest in the Great Reset is staggering, as data from Google Trends (GT) shows that in the second week of January 2022, the search query “Great Reset” achieved a GT score of 95 out of 100.

At the end of February 2022, for three weeks, the GT score of the search query remained at 99-100, and while the term fell to 35 in May, the subject Great Reset was again on the rise and the GT score of the term is 50 this week. GT Data started combining the Great Reset search query in May 2020 because it had a score of less than 1 that month. The topic’s search ratings also hit 100 in November 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

Keywords in this story

collectivism, communism, conspiracy theory, COVID-19, covid-19: the great reset, economics, economics, fascism, finance, financial reset, financial reset, great reset, great reset topic, International Freedom Forum, Klaus Schwab, Matt Gubba, Paul Mitchell, propaganda, reimagining capitalism, Sikh for Truth, social infrastructure, socialism, stakeholder economics, time magazine, WEF, WEF Davos, World Economic Forum

What do you think of the Great Reset and the people who have spoken out against the idea? Let us know what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Manager at Bitcoin.com News and a fintech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He is passionate about Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written over 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.


Add Comment